From: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: alter table set TABLE ACCESS METHOD |
Date: | 2021-06-09 20:45:52 |
Message-ID: | CALNJ-vQV32U7QpXWMbuHHxhB1eEBaPgZtvWGVbiwubRpO-AFKg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:31 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-06-09 at 13:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > There is a mix of upper and lower-case characters here. It could be
> > more consistent. It seems to me that this test should actually check
> > that pg_class.relam reflects the new value.
>
> Done. I also added a (negative) test for changing the AM of a
> partitioned table, which wasn't caught before.
>
> > + errmsg("cannot have multiple SET ACCESS METHOD
> > subcommands")));
> > Worth adding a test?
>
> Done.
>
> > Nit: the name of the variable looks inconsistent with this comment.
> > The original is weird as well.
>
> Tried to improve wording.
>
> > I am wondering if it would be a good idea to set the new tablespace
> > and new access method fields to InvalidOid within
> > ATGetQueueEntry. We
> > do that for the persistence. Not critical at all, still..
>
> Done.
>
> > + pass = AT_PASS_MISC;
> > Maybe add a comment here?
>
> Done. In that case, it doesn't matter because there's no work to be
> done in Phase 2.
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Davis
>
> Hi,
+ /* check if another access method change was already requested
*/
+ if (tab->newAccessMethod)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
+ errmsg("cannot change access method setting
twice")));
I think the error message can be refined - changing access method twice is
supported, as long as the two changes don't overlap.
Cheers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Zellers | 2021-06-09 20:51:54 | Re: [External Sender] Re: A modest proposal vis hierarchical queries: MINUS in the column list |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-06-09 20:45:32 | Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic |