From: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com, kasahara(dot)tatsuhito(at)gmail(dot)com, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process |
Date: | 2021-04-05 03:20:36 |
Message-ID: | CALNJ-vQ=x-9AgsVA5fQH_LZQABr+G3ATCPoWE-WFmwjd9Lhp3w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 7:56 PM torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 2021-04-01 19:13, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > On 2021/03/31 15:16, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> >>> + The memory contexts will be logged based on the log configuration
> >>> set. For example:
> >>>
> >>> How do you think?
> >>
> >> How about "The memory contexts will be logged in the server log" ?
> >> I think "server log" doesn't suggest any concrete target.
> >
> > Or just using "logged" is enough?
> >
> > Also I'd like to document that one message for each memory context is
> > logged.
> > So what about the following?
> >
> > One message for each memory context will be logged. For example,
>
>
> Agreed.
>
> BTW, there was a conflict since c30f54ad732(Detect POLLHUP/POLLRDHUP
> while
> running queries), attached v9.
>
>
> Regards,
Hi,
+ * On receipt of this signal, a backend sets the flag in the signal
+ * handler, and then which causes the next CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS()
I think the 'and then' is not needed:
handler which causes the next ...
+ * This is just a warning so a loop-through-resultset will not abort
+ * if one backend logged its memory contexts during the run.
The pid given by arg 0 is not a PostgreSQL server process. Which other
backend could it be ?
Thanks
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-04-05 03:21:03 | Re: A new function to wait for the backend exit after termination |
Previous Message | torikoshia | 2021-04-05 02:55:47 | Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process |