From: | Dinesh Chemuduru <dinesh(dot)kumar(at)migops(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] new diagnostic items for the dynamic sql |
Date: | 2021-12-17 05:24:50 |
Message-ID: | CALGdMEMJOufuPNyRZR4xakoEzCGkBN1OFVEjzPnsiGppunBy3w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 22:04, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 3:15 AM Dinesh Chemuduru <dinesh(dot)kumar(at)migops(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Attaching the latest patch here(It's the recent patch), and looking for
>> more suggestions/inputs from the team.
>>
>> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 13:09, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 01:58:58PM +0530, Dinesh Chemuduru wrote:
>>> > The proposed statements are much clear, but will wait for other’s
>>> > suggestion, and will fix it accordingly.
>>>
>>> This update was three weeks ago, and no new version has been
>>> provided, so I am marking this as returned with feedback in the CF
>>> app. If you can work more on this proposal and send an updated patch,
>>> please feel free to resubmit.
>>> --
>>> Michael
>>>
>> Hi,
>
> +int
> +set_errquery(const char *query)
>
> Agreed,
The other error log relateds functions are also not following the void as
return type and they are using the int.
So, I tried to submit the same behaviour.
See other error log related functions in src/backend/utils/error/elog.c
> Since the return value is ignored, the return type can be void.
>
> Cheers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-12-17 05:30:31 | Re: parallel vacuum comments |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-12-17 05:20:58 | Re: parallel vacuum comments |