Re: Refactor to make use of a common function for GetSubscriptionRelations and GetSubscriptionNotReadyRelations.

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Refactor to make use of a common function for GetSubscriptionRelations and GetSubscriptionNotReadyRelations.
Date: 2022-07-27 12:15:06
Message-ID: CALDaNm3sMeg0Au9m9-cvSXmNYdJRTyQxduvYyHFJJFzfFr5V2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 4:22 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 08:47:46AM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > I feel this would be an overkill, I did not make any changes for this.
>
> Agreed. Using an extra layer of wrappers for that seems a bit too
> much, so I have applied your v5 with a slight tweak to the comment.

Thanks for pushing this patch.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2022-07-27 12:32:01 Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2022-07-27 12:07:05 Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths