Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0
Date: 2025-03-18 04:02:09
Message-ID: CALDaNm3hAvDNJ7tr2b-vjR_sVyVvMhHgz_uTNsEBpG3NQHQ=jA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 at 23:03, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2025-03-16 at 19:10 +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > We currently have two Commitfest entries for the same thread at [1]
> > and [2]. Are both still necessary, or can we consolidate tracking
> > into
> > a single entry?
>
> I'm fine removing my CF entry, but unfortunately there's no "withdrawn
> -- duplicate", so it might send the wrong message.

Yes, we don't have "withdrawn duplicate", I have closed it as
withdrawn, anyway we can get it reviewed and committed using the other
entry.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2025-03-18 04:20:20 RE: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-03-18 03:56:42 Re: support fix query_id for temp table