Re: Incorrect result of bitmap heap scan.

On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 at 16:43, Matthias van de Meent
<boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 at 01:35, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> > > Is everybody in agreement about committing and back patching this fix,
> > > which simply disables the optimization altogether?
> > > I myself don't see a better way, but thought I'd ask before proceeding
> > > with review and commit.
> >
> > If you don't see a clear path forward, then "disable" is the only
> > reasonable choice for the back branches. Maybe we'll find a fix
> > in future, but it seems unlikely that it'd be back-patchable.
>
> Agreed.
>
> Here's patch v5 for the master branch (now up to f4694e0f), with no
> interesting changes other than fixing apply conflicts caused by
> bfe56cdf.

I noticed that Andres's comment from [1] is not yet addressed,
changing the commitfest entry status to Waiting on Author, please
address the comment and change it back to Needs review.
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/tf5pp2o2a5x5qjcseq354bd26ya4o7p2vjzm5z4w57ca3vy6bc@ep7enrljvdkr

Regards,
Vignesh