From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Runqi Tian <runqidev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, li jie <ggysxcq(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh(dot)rs0541(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
Date: | 2023-03-26 14:06:38 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm3XUKfD+nD1AVvSuZyUY_zRk_eyz+Pt9t13N8WXViR6pw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at 19:06, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at 09:22, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 8:17 PM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
> > <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Attach the new patch set which addressed above comments.
> > > 0002,0003,0004 patch has been updated in this version.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Hou zj
> >
> > Attached a patch-set which adds support for ONLY token in ALTER TABLE..
> > Changes are in patches 0003 and 0004.
>
> Few comments:
> 1) The file name should be changed to 033_ddl_replication.pl as 032 is
> used already:
> diff --git a/src/test/subscription/t/032_ddl_replication.pl
> b/src/test/subscription/t/032_ddl_replication.pl
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..4bc4ff2212
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/test/subscription/t/032_ddl_replication.pl
> @@ -0,0 +1,465 @@
> +# Copyright (c) 2022, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
> +# Regression tests for logical replication of DDLs
> +#
> +use strict;
> +use warnings;
> +use PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster;
> +use PostgreSQL::Test::Utils;
> +use Test::More;
> +
Modified
> 2) Typos
> 2.a) subcriber should be subscriber:
> (Note #2) For ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION, we haven't added extra logic on
> the subscriber to handle the case where the table on the publisher is
> a PARTITIONED
> TABLE while the target table on the subcriber side is a NORMAL table. We will
> research this more and improve it later.
Modified
> 2.b) subscrier should be subscriber:
> + For example, when enabled a CREATE TABLE command executed on the
> publisher gets
> + WAL-logged, and forwarded to the subscriber to replay; a subsequent "ALTER
> + SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION" is run on the subscrier
> database so any
> + following DML changes on the new table can be replicated without a hitch.
Modified
> 3) Error reporting could use new style:
> + break;
> + default:
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
> + errmsg("invalid conversion specifier \"%c\"", *cp)));
> + }
Modified
>
> 4) We could also mention "or the initial tree content is known." as we
> have mentioned for the first point:
> * c) new_objtree_VA where the complete tree can be derived using some fixed
> * content and/or some variable arguments.
Modified
> 5) we could simplify the code by changing:
> /*
> * Scan pg_constraint to fetch all constraints linked to the given
> * relation.
> */
> conRel = table_open(ConstraintRelationId, AccessShareLock);
> if (OidIsValid(relationId))
> {
> ScanKeyInit(&key,
> Anum_pg_constraint_conrelid,
> BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ,
> ObjectIdGetDatum(relationId));
> scan = systable_beginscan(conRel, ConstraintRelidTypidNameIndexId,
> true, NULL, 1, &key);
> }
> else
> {
> ScanKeyInit(&key,
> Anum_pg_constraint_contypid,
> BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ,
> ObjectIdGetDatum(domainId));
> scan = systable_beginscan(conRel, ConstraintTypidIndexId,
> true, NULL, 1, &key);
> }
>
> to:
>
> relid = (OidIsValid(relationId)) ? ConstraintRelidTypidNameIndexId
> :ConstraintTypidIndexId;
> ScanKeyInit(&key,
> Anum_pg_constraint_conrelid,
> BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ,
> ObjectIdGetDatum(relationId));
> scan = systable_beginscan(conRel, relid, true, NULL, 1, &key);
Modified
> 6) The tmpstr can be removed by changing:
> +static inline ObjElem *
> +deparse_Seq_Cache(Form_pg_sequence seqdata, bool alter_table)
> +{
> + ObjTree *ret;
> + char *tmpstr;
> + char *fmt;
> +
> + fmt = alter_table ? "SET CACHE %{value}s" : "CACHE %{value}s";
> +
> + tmpstr = psprintf(INT64_FORMAT, seqdata->seqcache);
> + ret = new_objtree_VA(fmt, 2,
> + "clause",
> ObjTypeString, "cache",
> + "value",
> ObjTypeString, tmpstr);
> +
> + return new_object_object(ret);
> +}
>
> to:
> ret = new_objtree_VA(fmt, 2,
> "clause", ObjTypeString, "cache",
> "value", ObjTypeString,
> psprintf(INT64_FORMAT, seqdata->seqcache));
Modified
> 7) Same change can be done here too:
> static inline ObjElem *
> deparse_Seq_IncrementBy(Form_pg_sequence seqdata, bool alter_table)
> {
> ObjTree *ret;
> char *tmpstr;
> char *fmt;
>
> fmt = alter_table ? "SET INCREMENT BY %{value}s" : "INCREMENT BY %{value}s";
>
> tmpstr = psprintf(INT64_FORMAT, seqdata->seqincrement);
> ret = new_objtree_VA(fmt, 2,
> "clause", ObjTypeString, "seqincrement",
> "value", ObjTypeString, tmpstr);
>
> return new_object_object(ret);
> }
Modified
> 8) same change can be done here too:
> static inline ObjElem *
> deparse_Seq_Maxvalue(Form_pg_sequence seqdata, bool alter_table)
> {
> ObjTree *ret;
> char *tmpstr;
> char *fmt;
>
> fmt = alter_table ? "SET MAXVALUE %{value}s" : "MAXVALUE %{value}s";
>
> tmpstr = psprintf(INT64_FORMAT, seqdata->seqmax);
> ret = new_objtree_VA(fmt, 2,
> "clause", ObjTypeString, "maxvalue",
> "value", ObjTypeString, tmpstr);
>
> return new_object_object(ret);
> }
Modified
> 9) same change can be done here too:
> static inline ObjElem *
> deparse_Seq_Minvalue(Form_pg_sequence seqdata, bool alter_table)
> {
> ObjTree *ret;
> char *tmpstr;
> char *fmt;
>
> fmt = alter_table ? "SET MINVALUE %{value}s" : "MINVALUE %{value}s";
>
> tmpstr = psprintf(INT64_FORMAT, seqdata->seqmin);
> ret = new_objtree_VA(fmt, 2,
> "clause", ObjTypeString, "minvalue",
> "value", ObjTypeString, tmpstr);
>
> return new_object_object(ret);
> }
Modified
> 10) same change can be done here too:
> static inline ObjElem *
> deparse_Seq_Restart(int64 last_value)
> {
> ObjTree *ret;
> char *tmpstr;
>
> tmpstr = psprintf(INT64_FORMAT, last_value);
> ret = new_objtree_VA("RESTART %{value}s", 2,
> "clause", ObjTypeString, "restart",
> "value", ObjTypeString, tmpstr);
>
> return new_object_object(ret);
> }
Modified
> 11) same change can be done here too:
> static inline ObjElem *
> deparse_Seq_Startwith(Form_pg_sequence seqdata, bool alter_table)
> {
> ObjTree *ret;
> char *tmpstr;
> char *fmt;
>
> fmt = alter_table ? "SET START WITH %{value}s" : "START WITH %{value}s";
>
> tmpstr = psprintf(INT64_FORMAT, seqdata->seqstart);
> ret = new_objtree_VA(fmt, 2,
> "clause", ObjTypeString, "start",
> "value", ObjTypeString, tmpstr);
>
> return new_object_object(ret);
> }
Modified
> 12) Verbose syntax should be updated to include definition too:
> * Verbose syntax
> * CREATE %{persistence}s SEQUENCE %{identity}D
> */
> static ObjTree *
> deparse_CreateSeqStmt(Oid objectId, Node *parsetree)
Modified
> 13) Verbose syntax should include AUTHORIZATION too:
> * Verbose syntax
> * CREATE SCHEMA %{if_not_exists}s %{name}I %{authorization}s
> */
> static ObjTree *
> deparse_CreateSchemaStmt(Oid objectId, Node *parsetree)
Modified
> 14) DROP %s should be DROP %{objtype}s in verbose syntax:
>
> * Verbose syntax
> * DROP %s IF EXISTS %%{objidentity}s %{cascade}s
> */
> char *
> deparse_drop_command(const char *objidentity, const char *objecttype,
> DropBehavior behavior)
Modified
> 15) ALTER %s should be ALTER %{objtype}s in verbose syntax:
> *
> * Verbose syntax
> * ALTER %s %{identity}s SET SCHEMA %{newschema}I
> */
> static ObjTree *
> deparse_AlterObjectSchemaStmt(ObjectAddress address, Node *parsetree,
> ObjectAddress old_schema)
> {
Modified
> 16) ALTER %s should be ALTER %{identity}s in verbose syntax:
>
> * Verbose syntax
> * ALTER %s %{identity}s OWNER TO %{newowner}I
> */
> static ObjTree *
> deparse_AlterOwnerStmt(ObjectAddress address, Node *parsetree)
Modified
> 17) ALTER TYPE %{identity}D (%{definition: }s) should include SET in
> verbose syntax:
> * Verbose syntax
> * ALTER TYPE %{identity}D (%{definition: }s)
> */
> static ObjTree *
> deparse_AlterTypeSetStmt(Oid objectId, Node *cmd)
Modified
> 18) extobjtype should be included in the verbose syntax:
> * Verbose syntax
> * ALTER EXTENSION %{extidentity}I ADD/DROP %{objidentity}s
> */
> static ObjTree *
> deparse_AlterExtensionContentsStmt(Oid objectId, Node *parsetree,
> ObjectAddress objectAddress)
Modified
Since there are many people working on this project and we do minor
changes on top of each version, I felt it is better to use DATE along
with the patches.
The attached patch has the changes for the same.
Regards,
Vignesh
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Infrastructure-to-support-DDL-deparsing-2023_03_19.patch | text/x-patch | 44.2 KB |
0002-Functions-to-deparse-Table-DDL-commands-2023_03_19.patch | text/x-patch | 130.9 KB |
0003-Support-DDL-deparse-of-the-rest-commands-2023_03_19.patch | text/x-patch | 206.2 KB |
0005-DDL-messaging-infrastructure-for-DDL-replication-2023_03_19.patch | text/x-patch | 41.5 KB |
0007-Document-DDL-replication-and-DDL-deparser-2023_03_19.patch | text/x-patch | 40.6 KB |
0006-Support-DDL-replication-2023_03_19.patch | text/x-patch | 200.9 KB |
0008-Allow-replicated-objects-to-have-the-same-owner-from-2023_03_19.patch | text/x-patch | 59.2 KB |
0004-Introduce-the-test_ddl_deparse_regress-test-module-2023_03_19.patch | text/x-patch | 920.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bryn Llewellyn | 2023-03-26 20:16:06 | Re: Is the PL/pgSQL refcursor useful in a modern three-tier app? |
Previous Message | vignesh C | 2023-03-26 12:38:37 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2023-03-26 14:08:41 | Re: Progress report of CREATE INDEX for nested partitioned tables |
Previous Message | vignesh C | 2023-03-26 12:38:37 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |