On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:19 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Sounds fine to me. Although CopyLoadRawBuf() does not seem to a
> candidate for rigorous code optimization as it does not get called
> that often.
>
I thought we could include that change as we are making changes around
that code. Rest of the changes looked fine to me. Also I noticed that
commit message was missing in the patch.
Regards,
Vignesh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com