From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improvements in Copy From |
Date: | 2020-07-14 06:47:49 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm3KZc=3JJsFAasgkatxEzaGbNZDHV=J0NeoO0O1JAGiGg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:13 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 17:22, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 00:46, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > b) CopyMultiInsertInfoNextFreeSlot had an unused function parameter
> > > that is not being used, it can be removed.
> >
> > This was raised in [1]. We decided not to remove it.
>
> I just added a comment to the function to mention why we want to keep
> the parameter. I hope that will save any wasted time proposing its
> removal in the future.
>
> FWIW, the function is inlined. Removing it will gain us nothing
> performance-wise anyway.
>
> David
>
> > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAKJS1f-A5aYvPHe10Wy9LjC4RzLsBrya8b2gfuQHFabhwZT_NQ%40mail.gmail.com#3bae9a84be253c527b0e621add0fbaef
Thanks David for pointing it out, as this has been discussed and
concluded no point in discussing the same thing again. This patch has
a couple of other improvements which can still be taken forward. I
will remove this change and post a new patch to retain the other
issues that were fixed.
Regards,
Vignesh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-07-14 06:51:19 | Re: Reducing WaitEventSet syscall churn |
Previous Message | Amul Sul | 2020-07-14 06:37:28 | Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY |