Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Wei Wang (Fujitsu)" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Yu Shi (Fujitsu)" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication
Date: 2024-01-10 13:10:12
Message-ID: CALDaNm3HGUZX0Y=W3BuqMSyd9wR20ACPxD1aTo=Wz5GY5S=dVw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 15:04, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 2:59 PM Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch is not applying on the HEAD. Please rebase and share the
> > updated patch.
> >
>
> IIRC, there were some regressions observed with this patch. So, one
> needs to analyze those as well. I think we should mark it as "Returned
> with feedback".

Thanks, I have updated the status to "Returned with feedback".
Feel free to post an updated version with the fix for the regression
and start a new entry for the same.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-01-10 13:16:30 Re: Make attstattarget nullable
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2024-01-10 13:08:03 Re: System username in pg_stat_activity