Re: Can we include capturing logs of pgdata/pg_upgrade_output.d/*/log in buildfarm

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can we include capturing logs of pgdata/pg_upgrade_output.d/*/log in buildfarm
Date: 2024-02-27 14:26:55
Message-ID: CALDaNm38CRtR_PYDd_JPSm7WyjGi7n0qutV-ZUDU5Sb1tfO5yw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 10:57, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
> On 2024-02-25 Su 11:18, vignesh C wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 08:36, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 07:24, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:51:08PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> >>>> First regex is the testname_clusterinstance_data, second regex is the
> >>>> timestamp used for pg_upgrade, third regex is for the text files
> >>>> generated by pg_upgrade and fourth regex is for the log files
> >>>> generated by pg_upgrade.
> >>>>
> >>>> Can we include these log files also in the buildfarm?
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] - https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=drongo&dt=2024-02-10%2007%3A03%3A10
> >>>> [2] - https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=drongo&dt=2023-12-07%2003%3A56%3A20
> >>> Indeed, these lack some patterns. Why not sending a pull request
> >>> around [1] to get more patterns covered?
> >> I have added a few more patterns to include the pg_upgrade generated
> >> files. The attached patch has the changes for the same.
> >> Adding Andrew also to get his thoughts on this.
> > I have added the following commitfest entry for this:
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/4850/
> >
>
> Buildfarm code patches do not belong in the Commitfest, I have marked
> the item as rejected. You can send me patches directly or add a PR to
> the buildfarm's github repo.

Ok, I will send over the patch directly for the required things.

>
> In this case the issue on drongo was a typo, the fix for which I had
> forgotten to propagate back in December. Note that the buildfarm's
> TestUpgrade.pm module is only used for branches < 15. For branches >= 15
> we run the standard TAP test and this module does nothing.
>
> More generally, the collection of logs etc. for pg_upgrade will improve
> with the next release, which will be soon after I return from a vacation
> in about 2 weeks - experience shows that making releases just before a
> vacation is not a good idea :-)

Thanks, that will be helpful.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-02-27 14:34:11 Re: abi-compliance-checker
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2024-02-27 14:22:30 Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring