From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Subject: | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2 |
Date: | 2023-01-27 14:41:45 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm33rkdym-8rTH4-oqf-TS-B5qCV=Lfeh69c7E2tKjZrcA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 04:49, Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> cfbot didn't like the rebased / split patch, and after looking at it I
> believe it's a bug in parallel apply of large transactions (216a784829),
> which seems to have changed interpretation of in_remote_transaction and
> in_streamed_transaction. I've reported the issue on that thread [1], but
> here's a version with a temporary workaround so that we can continue
> reviewing it.
>
The patch does not apply on top of HEAD as in [1], please post a rebased patch:
=== Applying patches on top of PostgreSQL commit ID
17e72ec45d313b98bd90b95bc71b4cc77c2c89c3 ===
=== applying patch
./0001-Fix-snapshot-handling-in-logicalmsg_decode-20230116.patch
patching file src/backend/replication/logical/decode.c
patching file src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c
=== applying patch ./0002-Logical-decoding-of-sequences-20230116.patch
patching file doc/src/sgml/logicaldecoding.sgml
Hunk #3 FAILED at 483.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 494.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 1252 (offset 4 lines).
2 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
doc/src/sgml/logicaldecoding.sgml.rej
[1] - http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_41_3823.log
Regards,
Vignesh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2023-01-27 14:45:29 | Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions |
Previous Message | vignesh C | 2023-01-27 14:39:16 | Re: Latches vs lwlock contention |