Re: Logical Replication of sequences

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Hou, Zhijie/侯 志杰 <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Date: 2024-07-29 10:47:35
Message-ID: CALDaNm3+XzHAbgyn8gmbBLK5goyv_uyGgHEsTQxRZ8bVk6nAEg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 12:08, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 9:06 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > The attached v20240725 version patch has the changes for the same.
>
> Thank You for addressing the comments. Please review below issues:
>
> 1) Sub ahead of pub due to wrong initial sync of last_value for
> non-incremented sequences. Steps at [1]
> 2) Sequence's min value is not honored on sub during replication. Steps at [2]
>
> [1]:
> -----------
> on PUB:
> CREATE SEQUENCE myseq001 INCREMENT 5 START 100;
> SELECT * from pg_sequences; -->shows last_val as NULL
>
> on SUB:
> CREATE SEQUENCE myseq001 INCREMENT 5 START 100;
> SELECT * from pg_sequences; -->correctly shows last_val as NULL
> ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub1 REFRESH PUBLICATION SEQUENCES;
> SELECT * from pg_sequences; -->wrongly updates last_val to 100; it is
> still NULL on Pub.
>
> Thus , SELECT nextval('myseq001') on pub gives 100, while on sub gives 105.
> -----------
>
>
> [2]:
> -----------
> Pub:
> CREATE SEQUENCE myseq0 INCREMENT 5 START 10;
> SELECT * from pg_sequences;
>
> Sub:
> CREATE SEQUENCE myseq0 INCREMENT 5 MINVALUE 100;
>
> Pub:
> SELECT nextval('myseq0');
> SELECT nextval('myseq0');
>
> Sub:
> ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub1 REFRESH PUBLICATION SEQUENCES;
> --check 'last_value', it is 15 while min_value is 100
> SELECT * from pg_sequences;

Thanks for reporting this, these issues are fixed in the attached
v20240730_2 version patch.

Regards,
Vignesh

Attachment Content-Type Size
v20240730_2-0001-Introduce-pg_sequence_state-function-for.patch text/x-patch 11.0 KB
v20240730_2-0002-Introduce-ALL-SEQUENCES-support-for-Post.patch text/x-patch 90.2 KB
v20240730_2-0003-Enhance-sequence-synchronization-during-.patch text/x-patch 86.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2024-07-29 10:48:33 Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-07-29 10:46:14 Re: Remove duplicate table scan in logical apply worker and code refactoring