Re: Conflict detection for multiple_unique_conflicts in logical replication

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Conflict detection for multiple_unique_conflicts in logical replication
Date: 2025-03-25 03:21:08
Message-ID: CALDaNm2ms1deM5EYNLFEfESv_Kw=Y4AiTB0LP=qGS-UpFwGbPg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 16:44, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 3:38 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 1:48 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> > <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 12:50 PM Nisha Moond wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks, Hou-san, for the review and fix patches. I’ve incorporated
> > > > your suggestions.
> > > > Attached are the v7 patches, including patch 002, which implements
> > > > stats collection for 'multiple_unique_conflicts' in pg_stat_subscription_stats.
> > >
> > > Thanks for updating the patches.
> > >
> > > Here are some more comments:
> > >
> > > 1.
> > >
> > > The comments atop of ReportApplyConflict() should be updated to reflect the
> > > updates made to the input parameters.
> > >
> >
> > Right, I also noticed this and updated it in the attached. Apart from
> > this, I have made a number of cosmetic changes in the attached. Please
> > review and include it in the next version unless you see any problem
> > with it.
> >
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> I’ve incorporated the changes and also addressed Hou-san’s comments
> from [1] with suggested changes.
>
> Attached are the v8 patches.

Shouldn't these statements be the other way:
pass('multiple_unique_conflicts detected during update');
should have been:
pass('multiple_unique_conflicts detected during insert');

and
pass('multiple_unique_conflicts detected during insert');
should have been:
pass('multiple_unique_conflicts detected during update');

if you are ok with above change, the attached patch has the change for the same.

Regards,
Vignesh

Attachment Content-Type Size
Update_expect_test_message.patch text/x-patch 894 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2025-03-25 03:30:59 Re: query_id: jumble names of temp tables for better pg_stat_statement UX
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2025-03-25 03:18:00 RE: Improve error reporting for few options in pg_createsubscriber