Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats.

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats.
Date: 2021-07-16 13:01:24
Message-ID: CALDaNm2cbPsC5WBzkBo3fgHHQHZFZ76yRmqc5WnjQonYz5sq7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 8:52 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vignesh.
>
> FYI - Because the other patch [1] was pushed ahead of this one, I
> think your patch now needs to be updated for the new message types
> that were introduced.

Thanks, I have made the changes for the same in the v5 patch attached.

Regards,
Vignesh

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0001-Included-the-actual-datatype-used-in-logical-repl.patch application/x-patch 15.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2021-07-16 13:05:44 Re: proposal: enhancing plpgsql debug API - returns text value of variable content
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2021-07-16 12:41:41 Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)