| From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression |
| Date: | 2025-03-21 12:45:38 |
| Message-ID: | CALDaNm2R5x2C6ObvksZP_yZ+nJ=2PBPj0SWvmo0n2Lub3VDXAA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 22:09, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Mar-20, vignesh C wrote:
>
> > Will it help the execution time if we use --jobs in case of pg_dump
> > and pg_restore wherever supported:
>
> As I said in another thread, I think we should enable this test to run
> without requiring any PG_TEST_EXTRA, because otherwise the only way to
> know about problems is to commit a patch and wait for buildfarm to run
> it. Furthermore, I think running all 4 dump format modes is a waste of
> time; there isn't any extra coverage by running this test in additional
> formats.
+1 for running it in only one of the formats.
Regards,
Vignesh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-03-21 13:02:43 | Re: making EXPLAIN extensible |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2025-03-21 12:41:00 | Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression |