From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test |
Date: | 2023-06-05 16:09:22 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm2Q_uE0Ash_1LTbqDQGSEM-8e9wjtuJ0QKTVdKNG34JWg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 at 03:51, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 07:49:52AM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > Thanks for the comment, the attached v3 version patch has the changes
> > for the same.
>
> -if (find_in_log(
> - $node, $log_offset,
> - qr/peer authentication is not supported on this platform/))
> +if ($node->log_contains(
> + qr/peer authentication is not supported on this platform/),
> + $log_offset,)
>
> This looks like a typo to me, the log offset is eaten.
>
> Except of that, I am on board with log_contains().
Thanks for fixing this.
> There are two things that bugged me with the refactoring related to
> connect_ok and connect_fails:
> - check_connect_log_contents() is a name too complicated. While
> looking at that I have settled to a simpler log_check(), as we could
> perfectly use that for something else than connections as long as we
> want to check multiple patterns at once.
> - The refactoring of the documentation for the routines of Cluster.pm
> became incorrect. For example, the patch does not list anymore
> log_like and log_unlike for connect_ok.
This new name suggested by you looks simpler, your documentation of
having it in connect_ok and connect_fails and referring it to
log_check makes it more clearer.
Regards,
Vignesh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Morris de Oryx | 2023-06-05 16:20:34 | Re: [BUG] pg_dump does not properly deal with BEGIN ATOMIC function |
Previous Message | Morris de Oryx | 2023-06-05 16:03:46 | Re: [BUG] pg_dump does not properly deal with BEGIN ATOMIC function |