From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Skipping schema changes in publication |
Date: | 2022-04-18 09:40:46 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm1rS+tde7RSD0VSEbdmER6QmHVyZGz5MZ9KmBeDLY2JRA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 7:18 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 12.04.22 08:23, vignesh C wrote:
> > I have also included the implementation for skipping a few tables from
> > all tables publication, the 0002 patch has the implementation for the
> > same.
> > This feature is helpful for use cases where the user wants to
> > subscribe to all the changes except for the changes present in a few
> > tables.
> > Ex:
> > CREATE PUBLICATION pub1 FOR ALL TABLES SKIP TABLE t1,t2;
> > OR
> > ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 ADD SKIP TABLE t1,t2;
>
> We have already allocated the "skip" terminology for skipping
> transactions, which is a dynamic run-time action. We are also using the
> term "skip" elsewhere to skip locked rows, which is similarly a run-time
> action. I think it would be confusing to use the term SKIP for DDL
> construction.
>
> Let's find another term like "omit", "except", etc.
+1 for Except
> I would also think about this in broader terms. For example, sometimes
> people want features like "all columns except these" in certain places.
> The syntax for those things should be similar.
>
> That said, I'm not sure this feature is worth the trouble. If this is
> useful, what about "whole database except these schemas"? What about
> "create this database from this template except these schemas". This
> could get out of hand. I think we should encourage users to group their
> object the way they want and not offer these complicated negative
> selection mechanisms.
I thought this feature would help when there are many many tables in
the database and the user wants only certain confidential tables like
credit card information. In this case instead of specifying the whole
table list it will be better to specify "ALL TABLES EXCEPT
cred_info_tbl".
I had seen that mysql also has a similar option replicate-ignore-table
to ignore the changes on specific tables as mentioned in [1].
Similar use case exists in pg_dump too. pg_dump has an option
exclude-table that will be used for not dumping any tables that are
matching the table specified as in [2].
[1] - https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/change-replication-filter.html
[2] - https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/app-pgdump.html
Regards,
Vignesh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2022-04-18 09:59:37 | Re: Stabilizing the test_decoding checks, take N |
Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-04-18 09:20:17 | Re: pg_receivewal fail to streams when the partial file to write is not fully initialized present in the wal receiver directory |