Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns

On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 at 14:57, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 5:25 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Future -- there probably need to be further clarifications/emphasis to
> > describe how the generated column replication feature only works for
> > STORED generated columns (not VIRTUAL ones), but IMO it is better to
> > address that separately *after* dealing with these missing
> > documentation patches.
> >
>
> I thought it was better to deal with the ambiguity related to the
> 'virtual' part first. I have summarized the options we have regarding
> this in an email [1]. I prefer to extend the current option to take
> values as 's', and 'n'. This will keep the room open to extending it
> with a new value 'v'. The primary reason to go this way is to avoid
> adding new options in the future. It is better to keep the number of
> subscription options under control. Do you have any preference?

Yes, this seems a better approach. Here is the attached patch which
handles the same.

Regards,
Vignesh