Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
Date: 2021-05-06 14:53:42
Message-ID: CALDaNm1_kj_NSeA5x--x4RsxP-0iZp-BjbkMb-gGyvjCNw5nxw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:43 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Here's a cleaned-up copy of the doc text.
>
> Send a request to the backend with the specified process ID to log its backtrace.
> The backtrace will be logged at message level <literal>LOG</literal>.
> It will appear in the server log based on the log configuration set
> (See <xref linkend="runtime-config-logging"/> for more information),
> but will not be sent to the client regardless of
> <xref linkend="guc-client-min-messages"/>.
> A backtrace will identify where exactly the backend process is currently
> executing. This may be useful to developers to diagnose stuck
> processes and other problems. This feature is
> not supported for the postmaster, logger, or statistics collector process. This
> feature will be available if PostgreSQL was built
> with the ability to capture backtracee. If not available, the function will
> return false and show a WARNING.
> Only superusers can request backends to log their backtrace.

Thanks for rephrasing, I have modified to include checkpointer,
walwriter and background writer process also.

> > - * this and related functions are not inlined.
> > + * this and related functions are not inlined. If edata pointer is valid
> > + * backtrace information will set in edata.
>
> will *be* set

Modified.

Thanks for the comments, Attached v8 patch has the fixes for the same.

Regards,
Vignesh

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Print-backtrace-of-specified-postgres-process.patch text/x-patch 16.7 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2021-05-06 16:02:30 Re: COPY table_name (single_column) FROM 'unknown.txt' DELIMITER E'\n'
Previous Message Nitin Jadhav 2021-05-06 14:02:45 Multi-Column List Partitioning