From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Adding a '--two-phase' option to 'pg_createsubscriber' utility. |
Date: | 2024-12-13 09:09:28 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm15CmSzOfP5dXjwdHPpJuiL6ZkC9VjN5rS_wh48aRLqbQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 at 13:01, Shubham Khanna
<khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 12:20 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Shubham.
> >
> > Here are my review comments for v6-0001.
> >
> > ======
> > 1.
> > +# Verify that the subtwophase is enabled ('e') in the pg_subscription catalog
> > +$node_s->poll_query_until('postgres',
> > + "SELECT count(1) = 2 FROM pg_subscription WHERE subtwophasestate = 'e';")
> > + or die "Timed out while waiting for subscriber to enable twophase";
> > +
> >
> > This form of the SQL is probably OK but it's a bit tricky; Probably it
> > should have been explained in the comment about where that count "2"
> > has come from.
> >
> > ~~
> >
> > I think it was OK as before (v5) to be querying until nothing was NOT
> > 'e'. In other words, until everything was enabled 'e'.
> > SELECT count(1) = 0 FROM pg_subscription WHERE subtwophasestate NOT IN ('e');
> >
> > ~~
> >
> > OTOH, to save execution time we really would be satisfied with both
> > 'p' and 'e' states here. (we don't strictly need to wait for the
> > transition from 'p' to 'e' to occur).
> >
> > So, SQL like the one below might be the best:
> >
> > # Verify that all subtwophase states are pending or enabled,
> > # e.g. there are no subscriptions where subtwophase is disabled ('d').
> > SELECT count(1) = 0 FROM pg_subscription WHERE subtwophasestate IN ('d')
> >
>
> I have fixed the given comment. Since prepared transactions are not
> being used anymore, I have removed it from the test file.
> The attached patch contains the suggested changes.
Few comments:
1) Since we are providing --enable-two-phase option now and user can
create subscriptions with two-phase option this warning can be removed
now:
<para>
- <application>pg_createsubscriber</application> sets up logical
- replication with two-phase commit disabled. This means that any
- prepared transactions will be replicated at the time
- of <command>COMMIT PREPARED</command>, without advance preparation.
- Once setup is complete, you can manually drop and re-create the
- subscription(s) with
+ If <option>--enable-two-phase</option> is not specified, the
+ <application>pg_createsubscriber</application> sets up logical replication
+ with two-phase commit disabled. This means that any prepared transactions
+ will be replicated at the time of <command>COMMIT PREPARED</command>,
+ without advance preparation. Once setup is complete, you can manually drop
+ and re-create the subscription(s) with
the <link linkend="sql-createsubscription-params-with-two-phase"><literal>two_phase</literal></link>
- option enabled.
2) Since we are not going to wait till the subscriptions are enabled,
we can use safe_psql instead of poll_query_until, something like:
is($node_s->safe_psql('postgres',
"SELECT count(1) = 0 FROM pg_subscription WHERE subtwophasestate = 'd'"),
't', 'subscriptions are created with the two-phase option enabled');
instead of:
+$node_s->poll_query_until('postgres',
+ "SELECT count(1) = 0 FROM pg_subscription WHERE
subtwophasestate IN ('d');"
+);
3) This can be removed from the commit message:
Documentation has been updated to reflect the new option, and test cases have
been added to validate various scenarios, including proper validation of the
'--enable-two-phase' option and its combinations with other options.
4) Should" two-phase option" be "enable-two-phase option" here:
const char *sub_username; /* subscriber username */
+ bool two_phase; /* two-phase option */
SimpleStringList database_names; /* list of database names */
Regards,
Vignesh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-12-13 09:20:13 | Re: per backend I/O statistics |
Previous Message | Alexander Kuznetsov | 2024-12-13 08:57:18 | Re: Detect buffer underflow in get_th() |