From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Store FullTransactionId in TwoPhaseFileHeader/GlobalTransactionData |
Date: | 2019-08-01 13:38:40 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm0uRGCpCEutFoJiPodGwydu5wVePorYdgHiV_FsiKBpwQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 5:36 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vignesh,
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:32 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > In the undo system, we use full-transaction-id for transactions. For
> > rollback of prepared transactions, we were planning to use
> > FullTransactionId by combining TransactionId and epoch, but as
> > suggested by multiple people in that email chain [1][2], the better
> > idea is to store Full-transactionid in TwoPhaseFileHeader
>
> +1
>
> > Backward compatibility need not be handled for this scnario as upgrade
> > does not support having open prepared transactions.
>
> +1
>
> > There is also one more comment which is yet to be concluded. The
> > comment discusses about changing subxids which are of TransactionId
> > type to FullTransactionId type being written in two phase transaction
> > file. We could not conclude this as the data is similarly stored in
> > TransactionStateData.
>
> No comment on that question or the patch yet but could you please add
> this to the next Commitfest so that cfbot starts testing it?
>
I have added it to the commitfest.
Regards,
Vignesh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2019-08-01 13:52:52 | BUG #15938: Corrupted WAL segment after crash recovery |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-08-01 13:25:49 | Re: pgbench - implement strict TPC-B benchmark |