Re: [PATCH] Add <<none>> support to sepgsql_restorecon

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add <<none>> support to sepgsql_restorecon
Date: 2023-01-31 17:41:32
Message-ID: CALDaNm0ti481FyQS1Z8nO11mV1dLyOJWOHZ_XDEciGq=hWvfXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 23:57, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world: not tested
> Implements feature: not tested
> Spec compliant: not tested
> Documentation: not tested
>
> This needs regression test support for the feature and some minimal documentation that shows how to make use of it.
>
> The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author

By mistake instead of setting the patch to "Moved to Next CF", I had
selected "Returned with Feedback". Sorry about that.
I have recreated the entry for this patch in the 03/23 commitfest:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/42/4158/

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2023-01-31 17:46:27 Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-01-31 17:35:26 Re: Clarify deleting comments and security labels in synopsis