Re: Lockless queue of waiters in LWLock

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lockless queue of waiters in LWLock
Date: 2024-01-20 01:58:14
Message-ID: CALDaNm0fKQzokq5-nXNFHmHcHStnEsNOvZ5jcLF6TdWEnYzhHA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 00:24, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi, hackers!
> In the measurements above in the thread, I've been using LIFO wake
> queue in a primary lockless patch (and it was attached as the previous
> versions of a patch) and an "inverted wake queue" (in faсt FIFO) as
> the alternative benchmarking option. I think using the latter is more
> fair and natural and provided they show no difference in the speed,
> I'd make the main patch using it (attached as v6). No other changes
> from v5, though.

There has not been much interest on this as the thread has been idle
for more than a year now. I'm not sure if we should take it forward or
not. I would prefer to close this in the current commitfest unless
someone wants to take it further.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2024-01-20 02:10:44 Re: Collation version tracking for macOS
Previous Message vignesh C 2024-01-20 01:53:36 Re: Documentation for building with meson