From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Lockless queue of waiters in LWLock |
Date: | 2024-01-20 01:58:14 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm0fKQzokq5-nXNFHmHcHStnEsNOvZ5jcLF6TdWEnYzhHA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 00:24, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi, hackers!
> In the measurements above in the thread, I've been using LIFO wake
> queue in a primary lockless patch (and it was attached as the previous
> versions of a patch) and an "inverted wake queue" (in faсt FIFO) as
> the alternative benchmarking option. I think using the latter is more
> fair and natural and provided they show no difference in the speed,
> I'd make the main patch using it (attached as v6). No other changes
> from v5, though.
There has not been much interest on this as the thread has been idle
for more than a year now. I'm not sure if we should take it forward or
not. I would prefer to close this in the current commitfest unless
someone wants to take it further.
Regards,
Vignesh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2024-01-20 02:10:44 | Re: Collation version tracking for macOS |
Previous Message | vignesh C | 2024-01-20 01:53:36 | Re: Documentation for building with meson |