From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup |
Date: | 2022-03-02 16:12:11 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm0WSo5369pr2eN1obTGBeiJU9cQdF6Ju1sC4hMQNy5BfQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 4:12 PM kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vignesh,
>
> > In logical replication, currently Walsender sends the data that is
> > generated locally and the data that are replicated from other
> > instances. This results in infinite recursion in circular logical
> > replication setup.
>
> Thank you for good explanation. I understand that this fix can be used
> for a bidirectional replication.
>
> > Here there are two problems for the user: a) incremental
> > synchronization of table sending both local data and replicated data
> > by walsender b) Table synchronization of table using copy command
> > sending both local data and replicated data
>
> So you wanted to solve these two problem and currently focused on
> the first one, right? We can check one by one.
>
> > For the first problem "Incremental synchronization of table by
> > Walsender" can be solved by:
> > Currently the locally generated data does not have replication origin
> > associated and the data that has originated from another instance will
> > have a replication origin associated. We could use this information to
> > differentiate locally generated data and replicated data and send only
> > the locally generated data. This "only_local" could be provided as an
> > option while subscription is created:
> > ex: CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub1 CONNECTION 'dbname =postgres port=5433'
> > PUBLICATION pub1 with (only_local = on);
>
> Sounds good, but I cannot distinguish whether the assumption will keep.
>
> I played with your patch, but it could not be applied to current master.
> I tested from bd74c40 and I confirmed infinite loop was not appeared.
Rebased the patch on top of head
> local_only could not be set from ALTER SUBSCRIPTION command.
> Is it expected?
Modified
Thanks for the comments, the attached patch has the changes for the same.
Regards,
Vignesh
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-Skip-replication-of-non-local-data.patch | text/x-patch | 42.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2022-03-02 16:15:28 | Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-02 16:09:27 | Re: Condition pushdown: why (=) is pushed down into join, but BETWEEN or >= is not? |