| From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Added schema level support for publication. |
| Date: | 2021-12-10 14:02:00 |
| Message-ID: | CALDaNm0Ri8M-mQNoudGZC8ajtv3tc18M-vR9BASc46N7t7WcSg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 6:24 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> I just noticed that this (commit 5a2832465fd8) added a separate catalog
> to store schemas which are part of a publication, side-by-side with the
> catalog to store relations which are part of a publication. This seems
> a strange way to represent publication membership: in order to find out
> what objects are members of a publication, you have to scan both
> pg_publication_rel and pg_publication_namespace. Wouldn't it make more
> sense to have a single catalog for both things, maybe something like
>
> pg_publication_object
> oid OID -- unique key (for pg_depend)
> prpubid OID -- of pg_publication
> prrelid OID -- OID of relation, or 0 if not a relation
> prnspid OID -- OID of namespace, or 0 if not a namespace
>
> which seems more natural to me, and pollutes the system less with weird
> syscaches, etc.
>
> What do you think?
I felt the existing tables are better normalized than the proposed one.
Regards,
Vignesh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-12-10 14:09:26 | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2021-12-10 13:43:08 | Re: Post-CVE Wishlist |