| From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Hou, Zhijie/侯 志杰 <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
| Date: | 2024-07-29 05:52:06 |
| Message-ID: | CALDaNm0PJ9y3reuwr73Gmsmobk7eFsx8x_LdNK+erY84vhKHdg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 08:04, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Here are some review comments for latest patch v20240725-0002
>
> ======
> doc/src/sgml/ref/create_publication.sgml
>
> nitpick - tweak to the description of the example.
>
> ======
> src/backend/parser/gram.y
>
> preprocess_pub_all_objtype_list:
> nitpick - typo "allbjects_list"
> nitpick - reword function header
> nitpick - /alltables/all_tables/
> nitpick - /allsequences/all_sequences/
> nitpick - I think code is safe as-is because makeNode internally does
> palloc0, but OTOH adding Assert would be nicer just to remove any
> doubts.
>
> ======
> src/bin/psql/describe.c
>
> 1.
> + /* Print any publications */
> + if (pset.sversion >= 180000)
> + {
> + int tuples = 0;
>
> No need to assign value 0 here, because this will be unconditionally
> assigned before use anyway.
>
> ~~~~
>
> 2. describePublications
>
> has_pubviaroot = (pset.sversion >= 130000);
> + has_pubsequence = (pset.sversion >= 18000);
>
> That's a bug! Should be 180000, not 18000.
>
> ======
>
> And, please see the attached diffs patch, which implements the
> nitpicks mentioned above.
These are handled in the v20240729 version attached at [1].
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm3SucGGLe-B-a_aqWNWQZ-yfxFTiAA0JyP-SwX4jq9Y3A%40mail.gmail.com
Regards,
Vignesh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2024-07-29 05:54:25 | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2024-07-29 05:49:39 | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |