Re: Enhance 'pg_createsubscriber' to retrieve databases automatically when no database is provided.

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Enhance 'pg_createsubscriber' to retrieve databases automatically when no database is provided.
Date: 2025-03-18 10:55:25
Message-ID: CALDaNm0GwY-ygVVQ=PCiTNtXOLQMX9yBn537fDVusOJRKm4oSg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 at 16:51, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 4:02 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 at 11:28, Shubham Khanna
> > <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:43 PM Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Fixed.
> > >
> > > The attached patch contains the suggested changes.
> >
> > I feel like we're trying to address two separate tasks in this thread:
> > a) Enhancing pg_createsubscriber to automatically retrieve databases
> > when none is provided. b) Refactoring all pg_createsubscriber tests.
> >
> > I suggest we keep this thread focused solely on retrieving all
> > databases and start a new thread for test refactoring. This will allow
> > us to tackle each task separately and ensure a cleaner commit.
>
> I was expecting that the argument validation tests will go in one test
> - existing as well as the ones for --all. But that's not how the patch
> is splitting them. It has split only the existing test. I am fine if
> we add a new test for --all option as the [patch does and leave the
> existing test as is. Cramming everything in one test makes it
> unmaintainable, though.

For this patch, let's add an additional test case to
040_pg_createsubscriber.pl and aim to commit it soon, as the rest of
the changes look good. I agree that the test split you suggested is
necessary, but let's handle that in a separate thread.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-03-18 11:10:07 Re: Index AM API cleanup
Previous Message Alena Rybakina 2025-03-18 10:54:48 Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree