From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Ordering of header file inclusion |
Date: | 2019-11-22 04:14:20 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm0EnH-Hg-mYV-7YDLzzVfAbS2BkzsSpQkPvDK-Qnu=eVQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 2:11 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 7:01 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:19 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 6:33 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Amit for your comments. Please find the updated patch which
> > > > does not include the changes mentioned above.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for working on this. I have pushed your latest patch.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks Amit for pushing the patch. I have re-verified and found that
> > changes need to be done in few more places. The main changes are made
> > in the header file and plpython source files. The attached patch
> > handles the same. I have verified make check and make check-world
> > including --with-python & --with-perl in the following:
> > CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908
> > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.1
> >
> > I have verified including --llvm in CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908.
> >
>
> Thanks for finding the remaining places, the patch looks good to me.
> I hope this covers the entire code. BTW, are you using some script to
> find this or is this a result of manual inspection of code? I have
> modified the commit message in the attached patch. I will commit this
> early next week unless someone else wants to review it.
>
I have used script to verify if the inclusions are sorted. There are
few files which I did not modify intentionally, they are mainly like
the below type as in uuid-ossp.c:
#include "postgres.h"
#include "fmgr.h"
#include "port/pg_bswap.h"
#include "utils/builtins.h"
#include "utils/uuid.h"
/*
* It's possible that there's more than one uuid.h header file present.
* We expect configure to set the HAVE_ symbol for only the one we want.
*
* BSD includes a uuid_hash() function that conflicts with the one in
* builtins.h; we #define it out of the way.
*/
#define uuid_hash bsd_uuid_hash
#if defined(HAVE_UUID_H)
#include <uuid.h>
#elif defined(HAVE_OSSP_UUID_H)
#include <ossp/uuid.h>
#elif defined(HAVE_UUID_UUID_H)
#include <uuid/uuid.h>
After the inclusion they have define and further include based on #if
defined. In few cases I had seen the include happens at the end of the
file like in regcomp.c as there may be impact. I felt it is better not
to change these files. Let me know your thoughts on the same.
Regards,
Vignesh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2019-11-22 04:26:16 | Re: pause recovery if pitr target not reached |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-11-22 04:03:48 | Re: Assertion failing in master, predicate.c |