From: | Rajesh Madiwale <rajeshmadiwale65(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Frost <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu>, Jason Mathis <jmathis(at)redzonesoftware(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Clarification on pg_basebackup |
Date: | 2014-09-24 06:03:35 |
Message-ID: | CALDEMcSLScGhoAU88aqXy+KhB4W3v-uw=XF4c2C5LL4k7Kj9bQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com> wrote:
> That's right.
>
Postgres ignore duplicate WAL file so we can recover the data without
using -X option while performing pg_basebackup.
>
> BTW, rather than rolling your own solution, you probably want to look at a
> few off the shelf solutions like:
>
> Barman: http://www.pgbarman.org/
> WAL-E: https://github.com/wal-e/wal-e
>
>
>
> On Sep 23, 2014, at 9:18 AM, Campbell, Lance <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu> wrote:
>
> Jason,
> Thanks so much. That makes sense. That was what I was trying to
> communicate. OPIT vs APIT.
>
> So if I am doing a APIT I can do a pg_basebackup each night without the –X
> option. I save all WAL files. If I need to restore during the day I then
> only have to restore from the last basebackup and apply all of the WAL
> files from that time forward. Did I get that correct?
>
>
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | gparc | 2014-09-24 07:42:22 | Re: Clarification on pg_basebackup |
Previous Message | Adalkonda Harshad | 2014-09-24 05:22:49 | Re: Cert verify failed on client side after renewal of certs |