Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table

From: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Rémi Lapeyre <remi(dot)lapeyre(at)lenstra(dot)fr>, Eli Marmor <eli(at)netmask(dot)it>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Georgios <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
Date: 2021-01-14 17:46:41
Message-ID: CALAY4q_YgDZSSHsyDAv2gY73GyWjt5V+DNUha3gL13dk9EepOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Ryan

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 7:50 PM Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com> wrote:

> I prefer to have them hidden by default. This was mentioned up-thread
> with no decision, it seems the standard is ambiguous. MS SQL appears to
> have flip-flopped on this decision [1].
>
>
I will change it to hidden by default if there are no objection

regards
Surafel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-01-14 18:05:14 Re: pg_preadv() and pg_pwritev()
Previous Message Surafel Temesgen 2021-01-14 17:42:21 Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table