Re: Disallowing multiple queries per PQexec()

From: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Disallowing multiple queries per PQexec()
Date: 2017-05-18 13:45:29
Message-ID: CALAY4q_4=XOXhhzp3A34XRBSGv7QuXb=KUoZcNU+Eo5mxyEF-Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

hey Vaishnavi

>
> I think GUC's name can be something like "multiple_query_execution" and
> setting it ON/OFF will be better. I think others will also come up with
> some suggestions here as the current name doesn't go well with other
> existing GUCs.
>
Thank you very much for the suggestion multiple_query_execution is better
and can be set using ON/OFF or true/false as documented in
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/config-setting.html

Regards
Surafel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2017-05-18 14:02:12 PostgreSQL 10 Beta 1 Released!
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2017-05-18 13:38:51 Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)