Re: Conflict handling for COPY FROM

From: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "asaba(dot)takanori(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <asaba(dot)takanori(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anthony Nowocien <anowocien(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Conflict handling for COPY FROM
Date: 2019-12-13 05:49:20
Message-ID: CALAY4q87BzLMUbc00btGU=CWNXgJxQv-ppEpwE6DwEEwZYmgOg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Asaba,

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 7:51 AM asaba(dot)takanori(at)fujitsu(dot)com <
asaba(dot)takanori(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:

> Hello Surafel,
>
> I'm very interested in this patch.
> Although I'm a beginner,I would like to participate in the development of
> PostgreSQL.
>
>
> 1. I want to suggest new output format.
> In my opinion, it's kind to display description of output and add "line
> number" and "error" to output.
> For example,
>
> error lines
>
> line number | first | second | third | error
> ------------+-------+--------+-------+------------
> 1 | 1 | 10 | 0.5 | UNIQUE
> 2 | 2 | 42 | 0.1 | CHECK
> 3 | 3 | NULL | 0 | NOT NULL
> (3 rows)
>
> Although only unique or exclusion constraint violation returned back to
> the caller currently,
> I think that column "error" will be useful when it becomes possible to
> handle other types of errors(check, not-null and so on).
>

currently we can't get violation kind in speculative insertion

> If you assume that users re-execute COPY FROM with the output lines as
> input, these columns are obstacles.
> Therefore I think that this output format should be displayed only when we
> set new option(for example ERROR_VERBOSE) like "COPY FROM ...
> ERROR_VERBOSE;".
>
>
i agree adding optional feature for this is useful in same scenario but
i think its a material for future improvement after basic feature done.

>
> 2. I have a question about copy meta-command.
> When I executed copy meta-command, output wasn't displayed.
> Does it correspond to copy meta-command?
>
>
okay . i will look at it
thank you

regards
Surafel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2019-12-13 06:01:24 Re: xact_start for walsender & logical decoding not updated
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2019-12-13 05:48:46 Re: Questions about PostgreSQL implementation details