| From: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table |
| Date: | 2017-06-06 20:41:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAL9smLDNgc507mFOrSWo7v=ifJjhh3_BaTSrLGFtJWKx9iz1sw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Nice as it would be to add a SQL standard feature and advance the
> effort to get to incremental maintenance of materialized views, and
> much as I really appreciate the efforts Thomas has put into trying
> to solve these problems, I agree that it is best to revert the
> feature. It took years to get an in-depth review, then I was asked
> not to commit it because others were working on patches that would
> conflict. That just doesn't leave enough time to address these
> issues before release. Fundamentally, I'm not sure that there is a
> level of interest sufficient to support the effort.
>
> I'll give it a few days for objections before reverting.
>
I can only say that the lack of this feature comes up on a weekly basis on
IRC, and a lot of people would be disappointed to see it reverted.
.m
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-06-06 20:43:19 | Re: postgres_fdw cost estimation defaults and documentation |
| Previous Message | Jeevan Ladhe | 2017-06-06 20:38:33 | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |