Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]
Date: 2017-11-30 12:29:57
Message-ID: CAL9smLD1c6uXPNiMeOCoicqiLMzw3aufubMPD+WnCrm6VcdaSA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > The patch does not currently apply. I am noticing as well that Peter
> > Geoghegan has registered himself as a reviewer a couple of hours back,
> > so moved to next CF with waiting on author as status.
>
> Marko unregistered me, so I promptly reregistered. You'll have to ask him
> why.

Oops. I didn't mean to do what I did, and I apologize. I had my months
mixed up and I thought this commit fest had ended without you having looked
at the patch, so I assumed you would register in the next CF if you were
still interested, or someone else could pick it up.

In any case, *I* don't have any interest in pursuing this patch at this
point. I think this is a really good feature, and as far as I know the
patch is technically solid, or at least was when it still applied. Can
someone else take it from here?

.m

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-11-30 12:40:47 Re: [HACKERS] Removing LEFT JOINs in more cases
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-11-30 12:03:06 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table