database redesign

From: zach cruise <zachc1980(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: database redesign
Date: 2013-11-08 19:44:15
Message-ID: CAL8icXzxq7UznUto97r_DTkBshwGe9c28=x9WgitYnmzn4sBFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

my response hasn't shown up on
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/upgrading-to-9-3-td5777291.html so
trying again. sorry if both show up.

anyway, on database reorganization - is it recommended to group all
sequences and domains under one public schema? or is a sequence tied to a
table as its counter?

what are some replication choices for x64 systems since slony is not an
option?

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2013-11-08 20:09:38 Re: database redesign
Previous Message John R Pierce 2013-11-08 18:00:31 Re: psql variable interpolation with subsequent underscore