Re: BUG #18098: Console code page issue Postgresql 14.7

From: Gokul Krishnan <gokulkrishnan99102(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18098: Console code page issue Postgresql 14.7
Date: 2023-09-13 17:06:29
Message-ID: CAL75wykgep8CmdApzdj2wEW4+KEet3kxPe=zycCYnB6GchzL1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hi kyotaro,

Thank you for your response. It makes sense. Let me check and get back to
you in case of any queries.

*Thanks & Regards,*
Gokul

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, 8:32 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> At Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:36:03 +0530, Gokul Krishnan <
> gokulkrishnan99102(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> > Hi Laurenz,
> > I have shared all the required details in previous mail, Kindly provide a
> > solution for this issue.
>
> Thanks for the info. It suspect that the issue arises because chcp
> prints "Active code page: 65001", which can clutter things up in
> various situations. AFAICS there's no option to silence it. It's
> puzzling why Microsoft would suggest such a problematic setup (if it
> really does).
>
> When initdb probes for the postgres version, it uses _popen. From what
> I gather, it uses cmd.exe. This action then may automatically runs
> chcp, injecting the line "Active code page: 65001" to the output. You
> can observe this with the following command line. initdb expects the
> secondline to come first.
>
> > work>cmd /c pgsql\bin\postgres -V
> > Active code page: 65001
> > postgres (PostgreSQL) 17devel
>
> For the record, I couldn't reproduced this issue on Windows 11, so I
> didn't observed what actually happens in this situation. Not entirely
> sure why, but maybe _popen in that version either bypasses cmd.exe or
> prevents it from executing autoruns. But, I face hiccups with
> VsDevCmd.bat when pulling output from subshells.
>
> As the result, I'd advise against doing that, especially on the server
> running PostgreSQL.
>
> I don't think we want to "fix" this issue, especially if Windows 11
> has already adressed it. But I'm not sure about this.
>
> regards.
>
> --
> Kyotaro Horiguchi
> NTT Open Source Software Center
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Sanford 2023-09-13 21:53:17 Segmentation Fault
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-09-13 14:17:28 Re: the same time value return different values,is it a problem