From: | 高健 <luckyjackgao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to evaluate "explain analyze" correctly soon after "explain" for the same statement ? |
Date: | 2012-11-08 05:05:45 |
Message-ID: | CAL454F2gXoykXOQ4mJfLsqdzZNXKpZXUsHALpGkEeNa4ntEo8A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi tom
At frist I have thought that the database parsed my explain statement,
so the pre-compiled execution plan will be re-used , which made the
statement's second run quick.
I think that what you said is right.
Thank you
2012/11/7 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> =?UTF-8?B?6auY5YGl?= <luckyjackgao(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > It might not be a big problem in a small system.
> > But when in a production environment, When I want to use explain and
> > then , soon use explain analyze for the same statement,
> > How can I avoid the influence of cache and get the right answer for
> > evaluating purpose?
>
> I think this question is based on a false premise. Why do you feel that
> the behavior with cold caches is "the right answer", and not the behavior
> with warm caches? A short-duration query like this one is not going to
> be interesting at all for performance unless it's executed quite a lot,
> and if it's executed quite a lot then the warm-cache result ought to be
> the more representative one.
>
> In general, trying to tune for cold-cache cases seems backwards to me.
> It's much more productive to try to ensure that the caches are warm.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-11-08 06:00:33 | Re: Does PostgreSQL have complete functional test cases? |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2012-11-08 02:03:59 | Re: Unexpectedly high disk space usage |