| From: | Dongming Liu <ldming101(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2019-10-30 04:22:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAL1p7e-iH+taqSkdQRfCq8nFjwCt80h6=VLd2+fA_Z2k+rJEUg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 9:12 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 01:40:41PM +0800, Dongming Liu wrote:
> > Can someone help me to confirm that these two problems are bugs?
> > If they are bugs, please help review the patch or provide better fix
> > suggestions.
>
> There is no need to send periodic pings. Sometimes it takes time to
> get replies as time is an important resource that is always limited.
>
Thank you for your reply. I also realized my mistake, thank you for
correcting me.
> I can see that Horiguchi-san has already provided some feedback, and I
> am looking now at your suggestions.
>
Thanks again.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-10-30 05:44:05 | Re: Rearranging ALTER TABLE to avoid multi-operations bugs |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2019-10-30 04:08:00 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |