| From: | Metin Doslu <metin(at)citusdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers |
| Date: | 2013-12-04 18:28:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAL1dPcd96ddmfY+XFzWpPz0RBmmpG1GktJWkA0yiFQnEukS1mA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
> You could try my lwlock-scalability improvement patches - for some
> workloads here, the improvements have been rather noticeable. Which
> version are you testing?
I'm testing with PostgreSQL 9.3.1.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2013-12-04 18:30:46 | Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-12-04 18:26:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2013-12-05 04:03:41 | Re: Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-12-04 18:26:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers |