| From: | Roger Pack <rogerdpack2(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | |
| Date: | 2015-09-01 15:56:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAL1QdWdo9VtkaK-83TooT2RnM1w8p6_G-5Bg+aNnzbPkrU1a1Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I don't think it would be horrifically hard to change the way toast OIDs
> are assigned (I'm thinking we'd basically switch to creating a sequence
> for every toast table), but I don't think anyone's ever tried to push
> toast hard enough to hit this kind of limit.
I'd be interested in promoting this effort, just to contribute back to
the community (scope from me: hundreds of dollars, before anybody gets
too). If anybody's interested give me a bid out of band. If anybody
else would be interested in contributing some money to this cause let
me know.
Thanks!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Blackwell | 2015-09-01 15:58:09 | Re: perlcritic |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2015-09-01 15:54:05 | Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding |