Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select

From: Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select
Date: 2013-04-12 17:42:26
Message-ID: CAKxBDU_V6hEABJ-DTntEka900_A3HCEi6=J-MFqddJdegdYxZg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Apologies for that Tom. I will paste the information in line once I'm
back at my computer. I do appreciate your help.

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I updated my SO question with some more info including explain analyze
>> (no difference), \d,
>> and your last incantation.
>
> The question is being asked here, not in SO, and I find it rather
> impolite of you to expect me to go chasing off to some other forum
> to answer your question.
>
> regards, tom lane

--
Yang Zhang
http://yz.mit.edu/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Flower 2013-04-12 20:34:26 Re: Automatic restart while upgrade
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-04-12 17:24:02 Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select