From: | Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select |
Date: | 2013-04-12 08:45:15 |
Message-ID: | CAKxBDU-vqLkpeL95ga4MrVG6f-0oyQT91e1G_MgMtmUe-jp-kg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Doesn't seem to be the case. This table has been around for a while
and should have been auto-analyzed by now. But anyway:
db=> analyze lead;
ANALYZE
db=> explain select * from lead where email = 'foo(at)blah(dot)com';
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on lead (cost=10000000000.00..10000319666.99 rows=1 width=5208)
Filter: (email = 'foo(at)blah(dot)com'::text)
(2 rows)
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:13 AM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:
> On 4/12/2013 1:03 AM, Yang Zhang wrote:
>>
>> db=> explain select * from lead where email = 'blah';
>> QUERY PLAN
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Seq Scan on lead (cost=0.00..319599.38 rows=1 width=5108)
>> Filter: (email = 'blah'::text)
>
>
>
> try EXPLAIN ANALYZE ..... its more useful.
>
> my guess is, there's no statistics on this table, and doing an ANALYZE lead;
> would rectify this.
>
>
>
> --
> john r pierce 37N 122W
> somewhere on the middle of the left coast
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
--
Yang Zhang
http://yz.mit.edu/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | stephane.schildknecht | 2013-04-12 08:48:20 | Automatic restart while upgrade |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2013-04-12 08:13:59 | Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select |