Re: JSONB performance enhancement for 9.6

From: Tom Smith <tomsmith1989sk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JSONB performance enhancement for 9.6
Date: 2015-11-29 13:35:22
Message-ID: CAKwSVFGMzErJT=Wf0HfFxymXWsZKNoW4uTcHg-qFyEXs2iDK7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Unfortunately, the keys can not be predefined or fixed. it is a doc, the
reason jsonb
is used. It works well for small docs with small number of keys.
but really slow with large number of keys. If this issue is resolved, I
think Postgresql
would be an absolutely superior choice over MongoDB.for document data.

On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:37 AM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:

> On 11/28/2015 6:27 PM, Tom Smith wrote:
>
>> Is there a plan for 9.6 to resolve the issue of very slow query/retrieval
>> of jsonb fields
>> when there are large number (maybe several thousands) of top level keys.
>> Currently, if I save a large json document with top level keys of
>> thousands and query/retrieve
>> field values, the whole document has to be first decompressed and load
>> to memory
>> before searching for the specific field key/value.
>>
>
> If it was my data, I'd be decomposing that large JSON thing into multiple
> SQL records, and storing as much stuff as possible in named SQL fields,
> using JSON in the database only for things that are too ambiguous for SQL.
>
>
>
> --
> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2015-11-29 14:23:19 Re: using a postgres table as a multi-writer multi-updater queue
Previous Message Tom Smith 2015-11-29 13:24:12 Re: JSONB performance enhancement for 9.6