Re: DEFERRABLE NOT NULL constraint

From: Bèrto ëd Sèra <berto(dot)d(dot)sera(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "Gavan Schneider *EXTERN*" <pg-gts(at)snkmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DEFERRABLE NOT NULL constraint
Date: 2013-02-07 09:14:16
Message-ID: CAKwGa__vmpJeSUNYJMEzd9gRsgpBnZPsoaqJ4VOOpjMZ9GcJcg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi

> This restriction is specified in the SQL standard.

Thanks! This is the kind of thing one CAN sell to customers :) "Your
thing is out of standards, Sir" sounds much better than "But I really
hate that, Sir".

Which has, however, a terrible impact on the ORM that use circular
FKs. Will have to think this over very well.

Cheers
Bèrto

--
==============================
If Pac-Man had affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in a
darkened room munching pills and listening to repetitive music.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2013-02-07 09:33:37 Re: DEFERRABLE NOT NULL constraint
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2013-02-07 09:09:20 Re: DEFERRABLE NOT NULL constraint