Re: Backups

Hi

yes, if you get like ~2.5 when running it in peak hour it should definitely
be harmless.

Bèrto

On 15 March 2012 12:37, Richard Harley <richard(at)scholarpack(dot)com> wrote:

> **
> Thanks for a quick reply. The server has 6 cores, 6GB ram and top gets to
> 2.3-2.5 load average when running the dumpall. So I assume we are nowhere
> near this causing performance issues for users?
> Thanks
> Rich
>
>
>
>
>
> On 15/03/12 12:21, Bèrto ëd Sèra wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> it's no easy answer. If your server has plenty of free resources there
> won't be trouble, but I do have customers who cannot even imagine of
> launching a dump in normal traffic hours. How loaded is your box, currently?
>
> Cheerio
> Bèrto
>
> On 15 March 2012 12:15, Richard Harley <richard(at)scholarpack(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> Very simple question - does pg_dump/dumpall hit the server in terms of
> database performance? We currently do nightly backups and I want to move to
> hourly backups but not at the expense of hogging all the resources for 5
> mins.
>
> Pg_dumpall is currently producing a 1GB file - that's the combined size of
> around 30 databases and it takes around 5 mins to run.
>
> Thanks
> Rich
>
>
>
>
> --
> ==============================
> If Pac-Man had affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in a
> darkened room munching pills and listening to repetitive music.
>
>
>

--
==============================
If Pac-Man had affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in a
darkened room munching pills and listening to repetitive music.