Re: Backups

From: Bèrto ëd Sèra <berto(dot)d(dot)sera(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: richard(at)scholarpack(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Backups
Date: 2012-03-15 12:21:12
Message-ID: CAKwGa_9v171YzWzJtOV4xNn==aXQLFt2fjaup5CV2vP2Fkmdag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Richard,

it's no easy answer. If your server has plenty of free resources there
won't be trouble, but I do have customers who cannot even imagine of
launching a dump in normal traffic hours. How loaded is your box, currently?

Cheerio
Bèrto

On 15 March 2012 12:15, Richard Harley <richard(at)scholarpack(dot)com> wrote:

> **
> Hello all
>
> Very simple question - does pg_dump/dumpall hit the server in terms of
> database performance? We currently do nightly backups and I want to move to
> hourly backups but not at the expense of hogging all the resources for 5
> mins.
>
> Pg_dumpall is currently producing a 1GB file - that's the combined size of
> around 30 databases and it takes around 5 mins to run.
>
> Thanks
> Rich
>

--
==============================
If Pac-Man had affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in a
darkened room munching pills and listening to repetitive music.

In response to

  • Backups at 2012-03-15 12:15:58 from Richard Harley

Responses

  • Re: Backups at 2012-03-15 12:37:02 from Richard Harley

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Harley 2012-03-15 12:37:02 Re: Backups
Previous Message Richard Harley 2012-03-15 12:15:58 Backups