From: | Bèrto ëd Sèra <berto(dot)d(dot)sera(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | richard(at)scholarpack(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Backups |
Date: | 2012-03-15 12:21:12 |
Message-ID: | CAKwGa_9v171YzWzJtOV4xNn==aXQLFt2fjaup5CV2vP2Fkmdag@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Richard,
it's no easy answer. If your server has plenty of free resources there
won't be trouble, but I do have customers who cannot even imagine of
launching a dump in normal traffic hours. How loaded is your box, currently?
Cheerio
Bèrto
On 15 March 2012 12:15, Richard Harley <richard(at)scholarpack(dot)com> wrote:
> **
> Hello all
>
> Very simple question - does pg_dump/dumpall hit the server in terms of
> database performance? We currently do nightly backups and I want to move to
> hourly backups but not at the expense of hogging all the resources for 5
> mins.
>
> Pg_dumpall is currently producing a 1GB file - that's the combined size of
> around 30 databases and it takes around 5 mins to run.
>
> Thanks
> Rich
>
--
==============================
If Pac-Man had affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in a
darkened room munching pills and listening to repetitive music.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Harley | 2012-03-15 12:37:02 | Re: Backups |
Previous Message | Richard Harley | 2012-03-15 12:15:58 | Backups |