From: | Bèrto ëd Sèra <berto(dot)d(dot)sera(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Weiss <krewecherl(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Column "..." does not exist (view + union) |
Date: | 2011-12-17 21:36:00 |
Message-ID: | CAKwGa_9D9M6V+bYJwayx_JtD1Tq3oQ0vouSXSshebQ8bbiJGMg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Hi,
>I see. So this has to do with the union; after combining the two
>queries, the tables from the FROM clauses are no longer available.
this has nothing to do with the UNION, but with the fact that the result
set is ordered after being produced, so you can order by any of its
elements, and only by that. You can actually order by calling them acording
to their position in the result set, like in:
SELECT
relname,
relpages
FROM pg_class
ORDER BY 1;
where 1 is actually the first element (no matter how it's called). The
table as such is never available to ORDER BY, no matter how simple your
query is.
Bèrto
--
==============================
If Pac-Man had affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in a
darkened room munching pills and listening to repetitive music.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bèrto ëd Sèra | 2011-12-17 21:49:58 | Re: using a generated series in function |
Previous Message | David Johnston | 2011-12-17 18:10:40 | Re: using a generated series in function |