Re: [patch][pgAdmin] Fix for pgadmin4-linux-qa #1651 failure

From: Rahul Shirsat <rahul(dot)shirsat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Aditya Toshniwal <aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch][pgAdmin] Fix for pgadmin4-linux-qa #1651 failure
Date: 2021-06-29 12:59:57
Message-ID: CAKtn9dP3nj5j6ZL-9ExyBz0rnm2-S2FO+qKTcituB+Z=5sPswg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi Hackers,

Thanks Aditya for pointing out the issue. Please find the attached patch
which contains all the .po files corrected with %s.

Regards,
Rahul Shirsat.

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 4:31 PM Aditya Toshniwal <
aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi Rahul,
>
> I did "make msg-extract" and "make msg-update" and looking at the PO
> files I think it is not updated correctly.
> For instance, the below message has msgstr without %s. I corrected it and
> the error was gone.
>
> #: pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/roles/static/js/role.js:766
> #, fuzzy, python-format
> msgid "%s Objects"
> msgstr "Obiekty"
>
> The one below had 2 %s in msgstr and I corrected it to fix the error.
>
> #: pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/roles/static/js/role.js:767
> #, fuzzy, python-format
> msgid "Are you sure you wish to %s all the objects owned by the selected
> role?"
> msgstr "Czy na pewno skasować %s \"%s\" i wszystkie obiekty zależne od
> niego?"
>
>
> You have to update the .po files to match the total %s and send the patch.
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 1:56 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 4:38 AM Rahul Shirsat <
>> rahul(dot)shirsat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> I feel gettext sometimes won't escape the characters as it should be.
>>>
>>> I now tried to escape those using some utils.
>>>
>>
>> That won't work either. The string being passed to gettext() *must* be in
>> the gettext call.
>>
>> When gettext extracts strings to create/update the catalogs, it will
>> search the code for all gettext calls, and then extract a string constant
>> from the first argument. You cannot have variables, function calls or
>> expressions in there. It *must* be a string constant.
>>
>> Keep in mind that msgextract is scanning the source code; it's not
>> executing it. There are many examples in the code, e.g. (from node.js):
>>
>> title = gettext('Drop %s?', obj.label);
>>
>> I don't see anything obviously wrong with the existing code. Are you sure
>> there are no weird unprintable characters in there?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Please find the updated patch.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:33 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 4:57 PM Rahul Shirsat <
>>>> rahul(dot)shirsat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Hackers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find the attached patch for fixation of jenkins failure.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That won't work - you can't include variables (or string building
>>>> operations) in the first argument to gettext calls, as there won't be any
>>>> way to extract a complete message into the catalogs. The way it's being
>>>> done at the moment is correct (I don't know why it's failing, but it's the
>>>> correct way to structure the gettext calls).
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave Page
>>>> Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>
>>>> EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Rahul Shirsat*
>>> Senior Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB Corporation.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
>>
>>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Aditya Toshniwal
> pgAdmin hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | *edbpostgres.com*
> <http://edbpostgres.com>
> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
>

--
*Rahul Shirsat*
Senior Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB Corporation.

Attachment Content-Type Size
jenkins_failure_fix_v3.patch application/octet-stream 5.9 MB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2021-06-29 13:31:42 Re: [patch][pgAdmin] Fix for pgadmin4-linux-qa #1651 failure
Previous Message Aditya Toshniwal 2021-06-29 11:00:27 Re: [patch][pgAdmin] Fix for pgadmin4-linux-qa #1651 failure