From: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CoC [Final v2] |
Date: | 2016-01-25 22:58:37 |
Message-ID: | CAKt_ZfvURURJCgBeUamJBFmt3+cvkWqXuYZdndTiD88dADT6hA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Just to respond to Josh's previous question:
Yes, I ike the current code of conduct. Much prefer to the alternatives
offered aimed at "feeling safe" (for the reason that keeping the peace in a
culturally diverse community will not allow people that luxury all the
time).
I am not convinced we need one, and I am worried about those who may be
moved by recent events to require one. But I think a statement of some
kind by the core committee regarding a productive environment for all is a
good thing and this CoC fits that bill
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This thread is deprecated. The CoC Final Draft has been submitted to -core
> for final modification, acceptance or decline.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
> --
> Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
> +1-503-667-4564
> PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zenaan Harkness | 2016-01-26 00:48:53 | request for comment re "contributor-covenant.org" |
Previous Message | Johannes | 2016-01-25 21:09:39 | Re: long transfer time for binary data |