Re: CoC [Final v2]

From: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CoC [Final v2]
Date: 2016-01-25 22:58:37
Message-ID: CAKt_ZfvURURJCgBeUamJBFmt3+cvkWqXuYZdndTiD88dADT6hA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Just to respond to Josh's previous question:

Yes, I ike the current code of conduct. Much prefer to the alternatives
offered aimed at "feeling safe" (for the reason that keeping the peace in a
culturally diverse community will not allow people that luxury all the
time).

I am not convinced we need one, and I am worried about those who may be
moved by recent events to require one. But I think a statement of some
kind by the core committee regarding a productive environment for all is a
good thing and this CoC fits that bill

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> This thread is deprecated. The CoC Final Draft has been submitted to -core
> for final modification, acceptance or decline.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
> --
> Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
> +1-503-667-4564
> PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zenaan Harkness 2016-01-26 00:48:53 request for comment re "contributor-covenant.org"
Previous Message Johannes 2016-01-25 21:09:39 Re: long transfer time for binary data